Bridging the Gender Gap: Examining Academic and Social Factors Influencing the Persistence of Women in Mathematics and Statistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63084/cognexus.v1i01.57Keywords:
Mathematics, Statistics, Women in STEM, Academic support, Social belonging, Gender diversityAbstract
Women remain underrepresented in mathematics and statistics despite efforts to increase gender diversity in STEM. This study shares initial results from a larger study that examines the academic and social factors influencing the persistence of undergraduate women in mathematics-intensive programs, with a particular focus on academic development and social support factors. Using a mixed-methods research design, survey responses from 24 undergraduate women and qualitative focus group discussions were analyzed to assess key retention factors. Findings from the survey responses indicate that participants in this study rated academic development factors such as coursework relevance and performance (91%) as well as the quality of instruction (70%) as more influential on persistence than social support structures, including peer interactions (38%) and faculty-student interaction (41%). The study highlights a critical research gap in understanding the long-term persistence of women beyond Calculus I. Recommendations include expanding faculty mentorship programs, integrating experiential learning opportunities, and implementing departmental policies to foster inclusive STEM environments. Future research should explore longitudinal studies, workforce transitions, and innovative pedagogical strategies to enhance retention. Addressing these challenges is crucial for creating gender-equitable STEM education and increasing the representation and persistence of women in mathematics and statistics-related careers.
References
Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. (2012). When do counter-stereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 370-383.
Baah, F., & Otten, S. (2025, February). Factors influencing persistence for undergraduate women in mathematics or statistics. Poster to be presented at the 27th annual conference on the Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Alexandria, VA
Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119.
Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from STEM majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427–448.
Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 153–192.
Bloodhart, B., Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M. A., Sample McMeeking, L. B., & Fischer, E. V. (2020). Outperforming yet undervalued: Undergraduate women in STEM. PLOS One, 15(6), e0234685.
Casad, B. J., Petzel, Z. W., & Ingalls, E. A. (2019). A model of threatening academic environments predicts women STEM majors’ self-efficacy and engagement in STEM. Sex Roles, 81(1-2), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0942-4
Concannon, J. P., & Barrow, L. H. (2010). Men’s and women’s intentions to persist in undergraduate engineering degree programs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 133–145.
Cromley, J. G., Perez, T., Wills, T. W., Tanaka, J. C., Horvat, E., & Agbenyega, E. T. (2013). Changes in race and sex stereotype threat among diverse STEM students: Relation to grades and retention in the majors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 247–258.
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Women peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 114(23), 5964-5969.
Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PloS one, 11(7), 114.
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241.
Findley-Van Nostrand, D., & Pollenz, R. S. (2017). Evaluating Psychosocial Mechanisms Underlying STEM Persistence in Undergraduates: Evidence of Impact from a Six-Day Pre–College Engagement STEM Academy Program. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 16(2), 1–15. https://doi:10.1187/cbe.16-10-0294.
Hilts, A., Part, R., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018). The roles of social influences on student competence, relatedness, achievement, and retention in STEM. Science Education, 102(4), 744–770.
Joseph, J. (2023). Factors that impact the persistence of women in STEM higher education: A systematic literature review. Federation University.
O’Connell, C., & McKinnon, M. (2021). Perceptions of barriers to career progression for academic women in STEM. Societies, 11(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020027
Ortiz-Martínez, G., Vázquez-Villegas, P., Ruiz-Cantisani, M. I., Delgado-Fabián, M., Conejo-Márquez, D. A., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2023). Analysis of the retention of women in higher education STEM programs. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01588-z
Park, L. E., Cook, K. E., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Implicit indicators of women's persistence in math, science, and engineering. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 6(4), 145–152.
Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education,5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-0180115-6
Rivers, E. (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons With Disabilities in Science and Engineering, Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest.
Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s beliefs about effort and ability in STEM predict self-efficacy and grades. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 131–143.
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in STEM. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270.
Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 468.
