Integrated Petrophysical–Seismic Machine Learning Workflows for Dual-Purpose Reservoir Evaluation Using Kubernetes–OpenStack Infrastructure.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63084/cognexus.v1i04.216

Keywords:

Petrophysical inversion, seismic machine learning, Kubernetes orchestration, GPU acceleration, reservoir characterization

Abstract

The convergence of machine learning, cloud-native infrastructure, and geoscience workflows has created unprecedented opportunities for reservoir characterization at scale. This study presents an integrated framework that operationalizes Kubernetes–OpenStack container orchestration for dual-purpose reservoir evaluation, targeting both hydrocarbon productivity prediction and CO₂ storage suitability assessment. Building on validated infrastructure optimizations for GPU-intensive AI workloads in multi-tenant environments, this research demonstrates how containerized petrophysical and seismic machine learning pipelines can deliver measurable improvements in prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and resource utilization. The proposed workflow integrates deep learning-based seismic attribute extraction, petrophysical property inversion, flow-unit classification, and storage capacity simulation within an autoscaling Kubernetes cluster deployed on OpenStack. Performance benchmarks reveal that GPU-accelerated training reduces model convergence time by 73% compared to CPU-only implementations, while container orchestration enables dynamic resource allocation that cuts infrastructure costs by 41% during peak workloads. The framework achieves 89.4% accuracy in porosity prediction and 86.7% in permeability estimation across heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs, while CO₂ storage capacity assessments demonstrate 92.1% agreement with conventional simulation methods at 18× faster execution speeds. By translating infrastructure-level efficiencies into domain-specific scientific outcomes, this work establishes a replicable methodology for deploying production-grade AI systems in computational geoscience, addressing the critical gap between cloud-native technology benchmarks and real-world reservoir engineering applications

References

Alfarraj, M., & AlRegib, G. (2018). Petrophysical property estimation from seismic data using recurrent neural networks. Society of Exploration Geophysicists Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2995752.1

Babasafari, A. A., Rezaei, S., Salim, A. M. A., Kazemeini, S. H., & Ghosh, D. P. (2020). Petrophysical seismic inversion based on lithofacies classification to enhance reservoir properties estimation: A machine learning approach. Natural Resources Research, 29(6), 4109–4135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09667-z

Gui, J., Gao, J., Li, S., Liu, B., & Chen, Q. (2024). A deep learning framework for petrophysical properties prediction in gas reservoirs. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 21, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2024.3464755

Haroon, S., Alyamkin, S., & Shenoy, R. (2018). Big data-driven advanced analytics: Application of convolutional and deep neural networks for GPU based seismic interpretations. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-193259-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/193259-MS

Jonet, A. (2024). A comprehensive automated subsurface workflow for accelerated carbon storage site identification and capacity estimation. 85th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2024, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101523

Joseph, C. (2013). From fragmented compliance to integrated governance: A conceptual framework for unifying risk, security, and regulatory controls. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(4), 238–250.

Khaz'ali, A. R., & Nick, H. M. (2023). A deep learning-based framework for high certainty CO₂ storage properties estimation. 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2023(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202335058

Mohebian, R., Riahi, M. A., & Kadkhodaie, A. (2019). Characterization of hydraulic flow units from seismic attributes and well data based on a new fuzzy procedure using ANFIS and FCM algorithms, example from an Iranian carbonate reservoir. Carbonates and Evaporites, 34(2), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0393-y

Mousavi, S. M., Beroza, G. C., Mukerji, T., & Rasht-Behesht, M. (2023). Applications of deep neural networks in exploration seismology: A technical survey. Geophysics, 88(6), WC1–WC21. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0063.1

Patchamatla, P. S. (2018). Optimizing Kubernetes-based multi-tenant container environments in OpenStack for scalable AI workflows. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Technology (IJARETY), 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15680/ijarety.2018.0503002

Pelemo-Daniels, D., & Stewart, R. R. (2024). Petrophysical property prediction from seismic inversion attributes using rock physics and machine learning: Volve Field, North Sea. Applied Sciences, 14(4), 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041345

Tagliamonte, R. L., Carrasquero, G., Fervari, M., & Tarchiani, C. (2018). Integrated workflow from thin section to seismic scale for seismic reservoir characterization. 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 2018(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800943

Zhang, Q., Yasin, Q., Golsanami, N., & Du, Q. (2020). Prediction of reservoir quality from log-core and seismic inversion analysis with an artificial neural network: A case study from the Sawan Gas Field, Pakistan. Energies, 13(2), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020486

Additional Supporting References:

Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2005). Quantitative seismic interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge University Press.

Chen, Y., & Zhang, D. (2020). Integration of machine learning and reservoir simulation for production forecasting. Computational Geosciences, 24(3), 1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-09941-x

Dramsch, J. S. (2020). 70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review. Advances in Geophysics, 61, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2020.08.002

Jennings, J. W., & Lucia, F. J. (2003). Predicting permeability from well logs in carbonates with a link to geology for interwell permeability mapping. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 6(4), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.2118/84942-PA

Karpatne, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Ravela, S., Babaie, H. A., & Kumar, V. (2019). Machine learning for the geosciences: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31(8), 1544–1554. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2861006

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

M Abraham-A, R. (2025). Integrated Petrophysical–Seismic Machine Learning Workflows for Dual-Purpose Reservoir Evaluation Using Kubernetes–OpenStack Infrastructure. CogNexus, 1(04), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.63084/cognexus.v1i04.216

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.